Performance of the genetically based racism instrument in medical students

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))
Published: Jan 17, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.720
Keywords:
Racism, medical students, reproducibility of results, factor analysis, validation studies
Performance of the genetically based racism instrument in medical students

Main Article Content

Adalberto Campo-Arias
(Human Behavioral Research Institute
Heidi Celina Oviedo
(Human Behavioral Research Institute
Edwin Herazo
(Human Behavioral Research Institute

Abstract

The concept of racial discrimination changes over the time; and today different forms are distinguished, among others, genetic, modern, symbolic and subtle. Accordingly, scales for quantifying these are proposed. The objective of the research was to determine the psychometric performance of the Genetically Based Racism Instrument (GBRI) among medical students of a university in Bucaramanga, Colombia. A validation study was done which participation of 341 students aged between 18 and 30 years, 59.2% females, completed a nine-item version of the GBRI. Cronbach alpha and McDonald omega were estimated. Internal structure was computed with exploratory factor analysis. RBGS presented Cronbach alpha of 0.81; and McDonald omega, 0.82. Internal structure was represented by one dimension responsible for 40.6 % of variance. As conclusion, GBRI has high internal consistency and one-dimension structure in the participating students. Future research should explore the performance of this instrument in students of other academic programs and Colombian cities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Campo-Arias, A., Celina Oviedo, H., & Herazo, E. (2014). Performance of the genetically based racism instrument in medical students. Duazary, 11(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.720
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2014): (January – June)
Section
Articles of scientific and technological research 
Commercial use of the original work or of possible derivative works is not allowed, the distribution of which must be done with a license equal to that which regulates the original work.
 
 
 
 
Author Biographies

Adalberto Campo-Arias, (Human Behavioral Research Institute

Médico psiquiatra, epidemiólogo, Magíster en Salud Sexual y Reproductiva, Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano y director de Investigacionesy Publicaciones del Instituto de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano (Human Behavioral Research Institute), Bogotá, Colombia.

Heidi Celina Oviedo, (Human Behavioral Research Institute

Médica, Especialista en Psiquiatría y MSc. E-learning, Profesora asociada de la Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano (Human Behavioral Research Institute), Bogotá, Colombia

Edwin Herazo, (Human Behavioral Research Institute

Médico, Especialista en Psiquiatría, Magíster en Bioética, MSc. (c) en Historia, estudiante de doctorado en Salud Pública (Universidad Nacional de Colombia), Grupo de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano y director del Instituto de Investigación del Comportamiento Humano (Human Behavioral Research Institute), Bogotá, Colombia.

References

Cea MA. La medición de las actitudes ante la inmigración: evaluación de los indicadores tradicionales de "racismo". Reis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. 2002 (99):87-111.

Sánchez R, Echeverry J. Validación de escalas de medición en salud. Rev. Salud Pública. 2004 Nov.; 6(3):302-18.

Parrott RL, Silk KJ, Dillow MR, Krieger JL, Harris TM, Condit CM. Development and validation of tools to assess genetic discrimination and genetically based racism. J Nat Med Assoc. 2005 Jul.; 97(7):980-90.

Paradies Y. A systematic review of empirical research on self-reported racism and health. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(4):888-901.

Pascoe EA, Smart L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(4):531-54.

Goto J, Couto P, Bastos J. Revisão sistemática dos estudos epidemiológicos sobre discriminação interpessoal e saúde mental. Cad Saúde Pública. 2013 Mar.; 29(3):445-59.

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. Población indígena, ROM y afrocolombiana, 2005. Bogotá DC: DANE; 2005. Disponible en: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/censo2005/etnia/sys/etnias.pdf. (Visitado: 15 de agosto de 2012).

García MJ, Rodríguez F, Carmona L. Validación de cuestionarios. Reumatol Clin. 2009;5(4):171-7.

Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Abr;17(2):268-74.

Blacker D, Endicott J. Psychometric properties: concepts of reliability and validity. In: Rush AJ, First MB, Blacker D. Handbook of psychiatric measures. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2002.

Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med. 2006 Feb.; 119(2):166. E7-16.

Resolución 008430 por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud; 1993.

McConahay JB. Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. En: Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL. Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando: Academic Press; 1986.

Cárdenas M. Escala de Racismo Moderno: Propiedades psicométricas y su relación con variables psicosociales. Univ. Psychol. 2007;6(2):255-66.

Cronbach J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334.

McDonald RP. Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970;23(1):1-21.

Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, Li W. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωh: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika. 2005;70(1):123-33.

Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;34(1):31-6.

Bartlett MS. Test of significance in factor analysis. Br J Psychol. 1950;3(1):77-85.

Campo-Arias A, Herazo E, Oviedo HC. Análisis de factores: fundamentos para la evaluación de instrumentos de medición en salud mental. Rev. Colomb. Psiquiatr. 2012;41(3):659-71.

Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. [revista en la Internet]. 2005 [citado 2011 Ago. 16]; 10(7). Disponible en: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf.

Pearson K. Determination of the coefficient of correlation. Science. 1909;30(1):23-5.

SPSS for windows 16.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2007.

Lynch J, Bevan J, Achter P, Harris T, Condit CM. A preliminary study of how multiple exposures to messages about genetics impact on lay attitudes towards racial and genetic discrimination. N Genet Soc. 2008;27(1):43-56.

Campo-Arias A, Oviedo HC. Propiedades psicométricas de una escala: la consistencia interna. Rev. Salud Pública. 2008;10(5):831-9.

Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(3):393-416.

Henson RK, Capraro RM, Capraro MM. Reporting practices and use of exploratory factor analyses in educational research journals: Errors and explanation. Res Sch. 2004;11(2):61-72.

Kasper D, Ünlü A. On the relevance of assumptions associated with classical factor analytic approaches. Front Psychol. 2003 Mar;4(109):1-20.

Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 1994 Abr;39(3):135-40.

Gorsuch RL. Exploratory factor analysis: its role in item analysis. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(3):532-60.

Pita S, Pértegas J. Relación entre variables cuantitativas. Cad Aten Primaria. 1997;4(3):141-4.

Katz MH. Study design and statistical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

Carretero-Dios H, & Pérez, C. Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2005;5(3):521-51.

Slocum-Gori SL, Zumbo BD. Assessing the unidimensionality of psychological scales: Using multiple criteria from factor analysis. Soc Indic Res. 2011;102(3):443-61.

Mosquera C, Laó-Montes A, Rodríguez C. Debates sobre ciudadanía y políticas raciales en las Américas Negras. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Universidad del Valle; 2010.

Phelan JC, Link BG, Dovidio JF. Stigma and prejudice: One animal or two. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug; 67(3):358-67.

Rodríguez MM. La invisibilidad estadística étnico-racial negra, afrocolombiana, raizal y palenquera en Colombia. Trab Soc. 2010 (12):89-99.

Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG. Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public health. 2013 May;103(5):813-21.

Fairchild HH. Scientific racism: The cloak of objectivity. J Soc Iss. 1991;47(3):101-15.

Dar-Nimrod I, Heine SJ. Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep; 137(5):800-18.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>