Beyond the guidelines: Editorial training as a key to avoid manuscript rejection
Main Article Content
Abstract
Scientific publishing presents various challenges for authors, and especially for researchers in training. In a recent publication, Pérez-Anaya et al.1 offer a pertinent perspective that invites reflection on some key factors that influence editorial rejection of manuscripts. The text clearly outlines the importance of compliance with editorial standards, the correct structuring of the method, and the appropriate presentation of references. Furthermore, they emphasize that these aspects are fundamental elements for guaranteeing the quality of publications and ensuring a significant contribution to the advancement of scientific knowledge.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Pérez-Anaya O, Wilches-Visbal JH, Campo-Arias A. ¿Por qué se rechazan tantos manuscritos? El peso olvidado de las normas editoriales [Why are so many manuscripts rejected? The overlooked weight of editorial guidelines]. Duazary. 2025;22:e6707. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.6707
Murray H, Payandeh J, Walker M. Scoping review: Research training during medical school. Med Sci Educ. 2022;32:1553-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01679-7
Barbero MG. La investigación en los planes de estudio: una necesidad olvidada [Curriculum research: a forgotten need]. Educ Med. 2020;21:283-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.09.003
Moruno MV. Enseñar a investigar: desafío para la Universidad del Siglo XXI [Teaching to investigate: Challenge for the University of the 21st Century]. Dictam Libr. 2019;12:81-102 . https://doi.org/10.18041/2619-4244/dl.24.5466
Stretton S, Bramich NJ, Keys JR, Monk JA, Ely JA, Haley C, et al. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012;28:1575-83. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2012.728131
Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jeroňcić A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. Plos One. 2011;6:e23477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023477
Gasparyan AY. Choosing the target journal: Do authors need a comprehensive approach? J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:1117-9. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1117
Minocha T, Bhagatwala T, Mirzoyan G, McDowell G, Fankhauser SC. Empowering future scientists: mentors employ various strategies to engage students in professional science disciplinary literacy practices. Discip Interdiscip Sci Educ Res. 2025;7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00124-0
Martinez-Campos M. Ten tips for teaching research integrity to early career students: A perspective over 20 years. Front Res Metrics Anal. 2022;7:989668. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.989668