Research designs: A practical classification

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España))
Published: Mar 22, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.6134
Research designs: A practical classification

Main Article Content

Adalberto Campo-Arias
Universidad del Magdalena

Abstract

La clasificación de los diseños de investigación se ha mantenido inmodificada en las últimas décadas; sin embargo, la polisemia relacionada con los nombres ha sido inconsistente y variada. Duazary con el ánimo de homogenizar los nombres para los diseños se acoge a una clasificación práctica más basada en el tipo de análisis y la exploración de una eventual dirección de causalidad que otras centradas en los modos o el tiempo de recolección de la información

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Campo-Arias, A. (2025). Research designs: A practical classification. Duazary, 22, e6134. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.6134
Issue
Vol. 22 (2025): Continuous edition
Section
Editorial
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Commercial use of the original work or of possible derivative works is not allowed, the distribution of which must be done with a license equal to that which regulates the original work.
 
 
 
 

References

Pikas E, Koskela L, Seppänen O. Causality and interpretation: A new design model inspired by the Aristotelian legacy. Constr Manag Econ. 2022;40:507-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1934884

Kang D, Evans J. Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science. Quant Sci Stu. 2020;1:930-44. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00056

Racines DE. Qualitative Research. In: Hott B, Brigham F, Peltier C. Research methods in special education. New York: Routledge; 2021. pp. 217-38.

Santa Cruz FF, Obando EC, Reyes GE, Rodríguez-Balcázar SC. Investigación cualitativa: una mirada a su validación desde la perspectiva de los métodos de triangulación [Qualitative research: a look at its validation from the perspective of triangulation methods]. Rev Filosof. 2022;39:59-72.

Nafees S, Anjum G. Phenomenology of counseling psychologists. Clin Counsel Psychol Rev. 2020;2:53-79. https://doi.org/10.32350/ccpr.21.04

Cladera JL. Epistemología reciprocitaria: aportes para un diálogo entre la antropología social y la investigación acción participativa [Reciprocal epistemology. Contributions for a dialogue between social anthropology and participatory action research]. Rev Latinoam Metod Cienc Soc. 2020;10:e065.

Sidharth G. Research designs for contemporary social science Research: An overview. Int Res J Manag Sociol Humanit. 2023;14:381-92.

Cooksey RW. Illustrating statistical procedures: Finding meaning in quantitative data. Third edition. Singapore: Springer. 2020, pp. 61-139.

Chao YS, Wu CJ, Po JY, Huang SY, Wu HC, Hsu HT, et al. The upper limits of risk ratios and recommendations for reporting risk ratios, odds ratios, and rate ratios. Cureus. 2023;15:e37799. https://www.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37799

Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>