La investigación basada en el diseño en contexto del Bildung: perspectiva que orienta el diseño de propuestas de enseñanza emancipadoras
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
Alzaghibi, M. A. (2010). Instructional Design: Development, implementation and evaluation of a teaching sequence about plant nutrition in Saudi. University of Leeds.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(Jan./Feb.), 16-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Biesta, G. (2002a). Bildung and modernity: The future of Bildung in a world of difference. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21, 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019874106870
Biesta, G. (2002b). How general can Bildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004401105_003
Biesta, G. (2012b). Have lifelong learning and emancipation still something to say to each other? Studies in the Education of Adults, 44, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2012.11661620
Biesta, G. (2013). Responsive or responsible? Democratic education for the global networked society. Policy Futures in Education, 11, 733–744. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.6.733
Bolte, C. (2008). A conceptual framework for the enhancement of popularity and relevance of science education for scientific literacy, based on stakeholders’ views by means of a curricular Delphi study in chemistry. Science Education International, 19, 331–350.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
Burman, A. (2014). Pedagogikens idéhistoria: Uppfostringsidéer och bildningsideal under 2500 år [History of pedagogy: Ideas of education and ideals of Bildung during 2500 years]. Lund: Studentlitteratur (in Swedish).
Bybee, R. (2015). Scientific literacy. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 944–947). Dordrecht: Springer.
Candela, B. F. (2016). La ciencia del diseño educativo. Cali, Colombia: Programa Editorial de la Universidad del Valle.
Candela, B. F. (2019). Los estudios de diseño una metodología de investigación novedosa para la educación. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias, 8(2), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.fac.cienc.v8n2.79267.
Candela, B. F. (2023a). Elementos de la práctica reflexiva en la formación y desarrollo profesional de los docentes. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, (54), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num54-16421
Candela, B. F. (2023b). La investigación basada en el diseño y el desarrollo curricular en la educación en ciencias. Bio-grafía, 16(31), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.17227/bio-grafia.vol.16.num31-19727
Candela-Rodríguez, B. F. (2024). El currículo de ciencias: un instrumento educativo de carácter político. Pedagogía y Saberes, (60), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.17227/pys.num60-18865
Christensen, C. (2009). Risk and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142293
Clements, D. H. (2014). Design experiments and curriculum research. In Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 428-440). Routledge.
Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2014). Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 86-113). Routledge.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp.15- 22). Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
Confrey J. (2006). The Evolution of Design Studies as Methodology. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. pp. 135-152.
Dos Santos, W. L. P. (2009). Scientific literacy: A Freirean perspective as a radical view of humanistic science education. Science Education, 93, 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20301
Cresswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches.
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ebenezer, J. (2013). Social justice pedagogy for all science learners. Studies in Science Education, 49, 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802461
Galloway, S. (2012). Reconsidering emancipatory education: Staging a conversation between Paulo Freire and Jacques Rancière. Educational theory, 62(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2012.00441.x
Gómez-Barrera, A. (2021). Formación ciudadana en Colombia: balance de la cuestión, retos y tensiones. Praxis, 17(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.21676/23897856.4040
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of "context" in chemical education. International journal of science education, 28(9), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021
Hodson, D. (2010). Science education as a call to action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.504478
Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future. Springer Science & Business Media.
Horlacher, R. (2012). What is Bildung? or why Pädagogik cannot get away from the concept of Bildung. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth (pp. 135–147). Rotterdam: Sense.
Jickling, B., y Wals, A. E. J. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 1–21.
Karplus, R., & Thier, H. D. (1967). A new look at elementary school science: Science curriculum improvement study. (No Title).
Klafki, W. (2000). The significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice:The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 85–108). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Lewinson, M., Flint, A. S., & Van Sluys, K. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79, 382–392. https://doi.org/10.58680/la2002255
Marks, R., Stuckey, M., Belova, N., & Eilks, I. (2014). The societal dimension in German science education– From tradition towards selected cases and recent developments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science & Technology Education, 10, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1083a
Nordenbo, S. E. (2002). Bildung and the thinking of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36, 341–352.
Norris, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2015). Scientific literacy: Its relationship to ‘literacy’. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 947–950). Dordrecht: Springer.
Reichenbach, R. (2016). "The source of learning is thought" reading the Chin-ssu lu (近 錄) with a "Western Eye". Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48, 36–51.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy: The influence of a science curriculum policy image. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 11–27). London: Routledge.
Ruitenberg, C. W. (2009). Educating political adversaries: Chantal Mouffe and radical democratic citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9122-2
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
Santos, W. (2009). Scientific literacy: a Freirean perspective as a radical view of humanistic science education. Science Education, 93(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20301
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Book.
Schulz, R. M. (2009). Reforming science education: Part I. The search for a philosophy of science education. Science & Education, 18, 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9167-1
Shwartz, Y., Weizman, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J. & Reiser, B. (2008). Middle School Science Curriculum: Coherence as a Design Principle. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, March, 2008 Baltimore.
Simonneaux, L. (2014a). Questions socialement vives and socio-scientific issues: New trends of research to meet the training needs of postmodern society. In C. Bruguère, A. Tiberghien, & P. Clement (Eds.), Topics and trends in current science education (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
Simonneaux, L. (2014b). From promoting the techno-sciences to activism – A variety of objectives involved in the teaching of SSIs. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 99–111). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sjöström, J. (2013). Towards Bildung-oriented chemistry education. Science & Education, 22, 1873–1890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9401-0
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education: Learning, teaching and assessment, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 165-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649
Sjöström, J., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2015). Chemistry education for sustainability. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education (pp. 163–184). Rotterdam: Sense.
Ståhl, M., & Hussénius, A. (2017). Chemistry inside an epistemological community box! Discursive exclusions and inclusions in Swedish National tests in Chemistry. Cultural Studies of Science Education,12, 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9730-z
Stolz, M., Witteck, T., Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). Reflecting socio-scientific issues for science education coming from the case of curriculum development on doping in chemistry education. Eurasia Journalof Mathematics, Science and Technological Education, 9, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.945a
Taylor, C. A. (2017). Is a posthumanist Bildung possible? Reclaiming the promise of Bildung for contemporary higher education. Higher Education, 74, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9994-y
Väkevä, L. (2012). Experiencing growth as a natural phenomenon: John Dewey’s philosophy and the Bildung tradition. In P. Siljander, A. Kivelä, & A. Sutinen (Eds.), Theories of Bildung and growth (pp. 261–279). Rotterdam: Sense.
Vásquez-Levy, D. (2002). Bildung-centred Didaktik: a framework for examining the educational potential of subject matter. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110056581
Von Humboldt, W. (2000). Theory of Bildung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 57–62). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Yin, R. K. (2003). Design and methods. Case study research, 3(9.2), 84.
Zeidler, D. (2015). Socioscientific issues. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 998–1003). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zuin, V. G., & Pacca, J. L. A. (2013). Formación docente em Química y ambientación curricular: Estudio de caso em uma instituición de enseñanza Brasileña [Formation of teachers in chemistry and curricular environmentalization: A case study in a tertiary education institution in Brazil]. Enseñanza de lasCiencias, 31, 77–91 (in Portuguese).