Hip fractures treatment alternatives

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.180
Keywords:
Fracture, hip, Intar capsular, Extra capsular, Osteosynthesis, Prosthesis
Hip fractures treatment alternatives

Main Article Content

Roberto Joaquín Del Gordo D´Amato

Abstract

Hip fractures are question common in our clinics and hospitals in patients over 60 years of age. This type of injury usually occur before trauma by falling from a low height, most of the time by a fall at his home. A large number of predisposing factors present in this age group have been described and within them the osteoporosis plays a leading role. Several classifications have been described depending on the location of the fracture stroke, however the anatomical limit of proximal femoral articular capsule is crucial and allows to classify them as intracapsular and extra capsular fractures. In current orthopaedic practice medical treatment of these injuries not have indication, except in very exceptional situations in which surgery implies imminent danger of death because of associated diseases and is surgical treatment that offers the best results. Surgical hip fractures resolution involves the use of a variety of implants whose election will be subject to a number of factors that depend not only on the type of fracture, but inherent to each patient situations in particular. The objective of this review is to seek consensus on the type of implant used in fractures of hip depending on various factors, and among them the location of the fracture stroke

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Del Gordo D´Amato, R. J. (2012). Hip fractures treatment alternatives. Duazary, 9(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.21676/2389783X.180
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2012): (July – December)
Section
Clinical report 
Commercial use of the original work or of possible derivative works is not allowed, the distribution of which must be done with a license equal to that which regulates the original work.
 
 
 
 

References

Ray Marks, Allegrante John, Mackenzie Ronald, Lane Joseph. Hip fractures among the elderly: causes, consequences and control. El Sevier. 2002; 57- 93.

Steimberg ME, La Cadera, Diagnóstico y Tratamiento

de su Patología. Editorial Panamericana. 1993; Cap 15, 290 – 332 y Cap16, 326 – 37.

Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wenn- berg JE: Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck: A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 15-25.

Garden RS, Reduction and Fixation of the sub-capital fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop North Am.1974; 5:683.

Gustillo RB, Kile RF, Premer RF, Análisis intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979; 61: 216 – 21.

Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Hip fracture management. 1993; Blackwell, Oxford

Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, et al. Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the NationalOsteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA. 2001;286:2815–822.

Grisso Jeaneann, Kelsey P. Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in woman. The New England journal of medicine.1991; Vol 324 No. 19. 1326-330.

Garrido G., Vidan M., Ortiz J. Epidemiología de la fractura de cadera en ancianos en España. Med. Interna (Madrid) 2002. Vol. 19. 389-95.

Gallagher JP, Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Bergstrath E. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota.1980. Vol. 150. 63-71.

Gradner MJ, Brophy MH, Demetrakopulus D, et al. Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fractures: A prospective randomized trial. Jbone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87:3– 7.

Kitamura S, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S y cols. Functional outcome after hip fracture in Japan. Clin Orthop. 1998; 348: 29-36.

Koval KJ, Maurer SG, Su ET, Aharonoff GB, Zuckerman GD. The effects of nutritional status on outcome after hip fracture. J Or- thop Trauma. 1999; 13: 164-69.

Abrami G, Stevens J. Early weightbearing after internal fixation of transcervical fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 1964; 46-B: 204–05.

Gerhart TN, Yett HS, Robertson LK, Lee MA, Smith M, Salzman EW. Low-mole- cular-weight heparinoid compared with war- farin for prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis in patients who are operated on for fracture of the hip: A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73: 494-502.

Zahn HR, Skinner JA, Porteous MJ. The pre- operative prevalence of deep vein throm- bsis in patients with femoral neck fractu- res and delayed operation. Injury. 1999; 30: 605-07.

Colwell CW Jr, Collis DK, Paulson R y cols. Comparison of enoxaparin and warfarin for the prevention of venous thromboem- bolic disease after total hip arthroplasty: Evaluation during hospitalization and th- ree months after discharge. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 932-40.

Colwell CW Jr, Spiro TE, Trowbridge AA et al. Use of enoxaparin, a low-molecular- weight heparin, and unfractionated heparin for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis after elective hip replacement: A clinical trial comparing efficacy and safety. Enoxaparin Clinical Trial Group. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76: 3-14.

Parker MS, Pryor GA, Myles J. 11-year re- sults in 2,846 patients of the Peterborough Hip Fracture Project: Reduced morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71: 34-8.

Aharonoff GB, Koval KJ, Skovron ML, Zuckerman JD: Hip fractures in the elderly: Predictors of one-year mortality. J Orthop Trauma. 1997; 11: 162-65.

Gilbert TB, Hawkes WG, Hebel SR y cols. Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthe- sia for hip fracture repair: A longitudinal ob- servation of 741 elderly patients during 2- year follow-up. Am J Orthop. 2000; 29: 25-35.

Thomas P Rüedi, Richard E Buckley, Christopher G Moran eds. Muller AO Classification. en AO Principles of Fracture Management. Second expanded edition. 2007. AO Publishing. Chapter 6. 751.

Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wenn- berg JE: Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck: A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76 (1): 15-25.

Swiontkowski MF. Intracapsular fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76(1):129–38.

Blair B, Koval KJ, Kummer F, Zuckerman JD: Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur: A

biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques. Clin Orthop. 1994; 306: 256-63.

Manninger J, Kazar G, Fekete G, et al. Significance of urgent (within 6h) internal fixation in the management of fractures of the neck of the femur. Injury. 1989; 20(2):101–5.

Fekete K, Manninger J, Kazár Gy, Cserháti P, Bosch U. Percutaneous internal fixation of femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws and a small tension band plate. Orthop Traumatol .2000; 8: 250–63.

Hung SH, Hsu CY, Hsu SF, et al. Surgical treatment for ipsilateral fractures of the hip and femoral shaft. Injury. 2004; 35(2):165–69.

Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ: Unipolar or bipolar prosthe- sis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: A randomised prospective study. 2000; J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996; 78: 391-94.

Lavernia CJ. Hemiarthroplasty in hip fracture care: Effects of surgical volume on short-term outcome. J Arthroplasty .1998; 13: 774-78.

Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, et al. Treatment for displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(2):206–12.

Reynolds MA, Richrdson JD, Spain DA, et al. Is the timing of fracture fixtion important for the patient with multiple trauma? Ann Surg.. 1995; 222 (4) 470 –81.

Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(6):394–400.

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(7):1058 64.

Bolhofner BR, Russo PR, Carmen B. Results of intertrochanteric femur fractures trea- ted with a 135-degree sliding screw with a two-hole side plate. J Orthop Trauma. 1999; 13: 5-8.

O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Blachut PA, et al.Fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: gamma nail versus dynamic hip screw. A randomized, prospective study. Can J Surg. 1995; 38(6):516–20.

Gebhard JS, Amstutz HC, Zinar DM, Dorey FJ: A comparison of total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for treatment of acute fracture of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop. 1992; 282: 13-31.

Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW: Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fracture: A randomised pros- pective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74: 345-35.

Aune AK, Ekeland A, Odegaard B, Groga- ard B, Alho A: Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures: 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994; 65: 127-30.

Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A, et al. A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop. 2002; 26(6):365–69.

Fernández Dell’Oca AA. The principle of helical implants – Unusual ideas worth considering. Injury. 2002; Vol. 33, Suppl. 1, S-A-1-27.

Babst R, Martinet O, Renner N, et al. The DHS (dynamic hip screw) buttress plate in the management of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1993; 123(13):566–68.

David A, Hüfner T, Lewandrowski KU, et al. The dynamic hip screw with support plate—a reliable osteosynthesis for highly unstable “reverse” trochanteric fractures? Chirurg. 1996; 67(11):1166–73.

Goodman SB, Bauer TW, Carter D y cols. Norian SRS cement augmentation in hip fracture treatment: Laboratory and initial clinical results. Clin Orthop. 1998; 348: 42-50.

Moore DC, Frankenberg EP, Goulet JA, Goldstein SA: Hip screw augmentation with an in-situ setting calcium phosphate cement: An in vitro biomechanical.

Most read articles by the same author(s)