The interview as an ethnographic approach in education: from fieldwork to discovery and data

Main Article Content

Judith Shapiro

Abstract

This article seeks to provide some reflections on interviews as a research methodology in ethnography of education, especially when dealing with historical topics that cannot be observed directly. We will work on the basis of the field experience carried out for a research on the meanings constructed by university students regarding the reform of higher education in Argentina in the 1990s. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with five people who had been university students during the nineties. Recognizing that fieldwork can often be overwhelming, the question about what the ethnographic findings are in an investigation allows us to refocus on what is most relevant. Two methodological movements emerge from this: the first one investigates and defines what an ethnographic discovery is, and the second one guides the elaboration path until arriving at what can be considered as data. In order to define a discovery, it is proposed to rethink the place of researchers as mediators in the process of exchanging meanings in the research context, and then the data constructing process is considered as a dialogue between different meanings and realities. The result of all this is the recognition of ethnographic field notes as a discursive genre in itself, which contains communicative dimensions that allow us to recognize the link generated between researchers and field subjects. It is emphasized that, on the research side, it is necessary to maintain a constant epistemological vigilance in order not to take for granted the meanings found, but to recognize them as constructions in situ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shapiro, J. (2024). The interview as an ethnographic approach in education: from fieldwork to discovery and data. Jangwa Pana, 23(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21676/16574923.5675
Section
Dossier: Etnografías I (part 2)

References

Achili, E. L. (2005). Investigar en antropología social. Los desafíos de transmitir un oficio. Laborde Libros Editor.

Fasano, P., & Schneider, G. (2023). La dimensión comunicativa en la producción de notas de campo [Clase 4]. Curso: Notas de campo en etnografía y educación: escribir, leer, interrogar, analizar y producir datos. IDES-UNTreF.

Foucault, M. (1969). ¿Qué es un autor? ElSeminario.

Guber, R. (2011). La etnografía, método, campo y reflexividad. Siglo XXI Editores.

Guber, R. (2013). La articulación etnográfica. Descubrimiento y trabajo de campo en la investigación de Esther Hermitte. Editorial Biblios.

Guerrero, A. L., & Milstein, D. (2017). Dialogar y producir alteridad. Un episodio de trabajo de campo con una niña de Colombia. En M. Dantas-Whitney, D. Milstein, Á. Clemente y A. L. Guerrero, Bordes, límites y fronteras. Encuentros etnográficos con niños, niñas y adolescentes (pp. 157-176). Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

Jelin, E. (2000). Memorias en conflicto. Puentes, 1(1), 6-13.

Krotsch, P. (2001). Educación superior y reformas comparadas (2.da edición). Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

Lins, G. (2004). Descotidianizar. Extrañamiento y conciencia práctica, un ensayo sobre la perspectiva antropológica. En M. F. Boivin, A. Rosato y V. Arribas, Constructores de Otredad. Una Introducción a la Antropología Social y Cultural (pp. 194-198). Editorial Antropofagia. (Trabajo original publicado en 1989).

Rivas, L. A. (2016). El referente en la enseñanza de la historia de la educación argentina en la formación docente inicial.