¿Qué pasa con el wac? arqueología y “compromiso” en un mundo globalizado
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
El año 2011 marca el vigésimo quinto del Congreso Arqueológico (WAC, por sus siglas en inglés). WAC marcó una audaz intervención la política del en el contexto de mediados de los años ochentas. Más, ¿cómo le fue en los mundos contemporáneos de la ? En este artículo, dos antiguos del WAC adoptan una mirada y crítica sobre las cambiantes , significados y contextos de.Centralmente, es un relato controvertido encuentro entre el Ejecutivo WAC y Rio Tinto minera, en Melbourne en 2007. Otras partes del artículo nociones de lo indígena, y discuten supuestos que integran el programa del WAC Sin Fronteras”. como un desafío, este artículo respuestas y comentarios, una de abrir un debate que permita entrever futuros alternativos la disciplina, más allá de la banal de una “Arqueología Ltda.”
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
Anon. (2004). Friends of the Earth International media briefing, 7 April 2004.
Anon. (2007). War Profiteer of the Month: Rio Tinto Alcan. War Resister’s International.
Anon. (2010). World Archaeological Congress. [accessed xxxxxx]. Available at:
< http://www.worldarchaeologicalcongress.org>
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2010). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Comaroff, J. L., Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity Inc. Scottsville: University of -Natal.
Deacon, J. (1986). Editorial. South African Archaeological Bulletin 41:4.
Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, movements, life, redes. Durham, : Duke University.
Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity.
Haber, A. (2009a). Animism, Relatedness, Life: Post-Western perspectives.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19:418-30.
Haber, A. (2009b). Back to life: Archaeology and the decolonial turn. In Advanced
Seminar on Theory in Archaeology: South Africa/ Argentina Bilateral.
University of Cape Town.
Hall, M. (2002). Going Local? The World Archaeological Congress and Effective
Action. World Archaeological Bulletin 15:1-9.
Hall, M. & Bombardella, P. (2005). ‘Las Vegas In Africa’. Journal of Social Archaeology (1):5-25.
Hall, S. & du Gay, P., eds. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. London: SAGE.
Hall, S., Held, D. & McGrew, T., eds. (1992). Modernity and its Futures. Cambridge:
Polity.
Hamilakis, Y. (2003). Iraq, stewardship and ‘the record’: an ethical crisis for
archaeology. Public Archaeology 3:104-11.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire.
New York: Penguin.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/ Harvard.
Kitchen, W. (1998). From Croatia to Cape Town: the future of the World Archaeological
Congress. Antiquity 72:747-50.
Mignolo, W. (1999). Local Histories/ Global Designs: Coloniality, subaltern
knowledges and border thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Mignolo, W. (2008). The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference.
In
M. Morana, E. Dussel & C. A. Jáuregui, eds. (2008). Coloniality at Large: Latin
America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham: Duke University.
Moody, R. (1992). Plunder: The story of Rio Tinto-Zinc: Partizans.
Perlez, J. & Bonner, R. (2005). Freeport Rio Tinto: Gold’s other price. New York
Times.
RioTinto. (2005). Rio Tinto: The way we work. Melbourne.
RioTinto (2007a). Rio Tinto: Community relations guidance note, cultural heritage
management guidance. Melbourne.
RioTinto (2007b). Rio Tinto: Community relations standard. Melbourne.
RioTinto (2007c). Rio Tinto: Engagement through social and environmental
partnerships and relationships. From global to local. Melbourne.
RioTinto (2007d). Rio Tinto: Working in partnership. Melbourne.
R (2007e). Rio Tinto: Working with communities. Common objectives,
diverse cultures. Melbourne.
RioTinto (2007f). World Archaeological Congress and Rio Tinto Workshop: we “partner” on Heritage Management (Melbourne Business School,-2 October), Melbourne.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Shepherd, N. (2006). What Does it Mean to Give the Past Back to the People?
Archaeology and Ethics in the Post-colony. In Y. Hamilakis & P. Duke, eds.,
Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics. London: UCL.
S, N. (2007). Archaeology Dreaming; postapartheid urban imaginaries
and the bones of the Prestwich Street dead. Journal of Social Archaeology 7:3-
Shepherd, N. (2008a). At the Sharp Edge of the Trowel: Archaeology, social movements
and the politics of memory and identity. In Material Worlds Seminar.
Brown University.
Shepherd, N. (2008b). Heritage. In N. Shepherd & S. Robins, eds., New South
African Keywords. Cape Town and Athens, Ohio: Jacana Media and Ohio University.
Shepherd, N. (2010). Keynote Address: Archaeology, Coloniality, Modernity. In
CHAT 2010 (Contemporary and Historical Archaeology and Theory). Oxford
University.
Ucko, P. J. (1987). Academic freedom and apartheid: the story of the World Archaeological
Congress. London: Duckworth.
Vassilopoulos, J. (1997). Rio Tinto: the world’s worst company? Green Left Weekly
West, R. (1972). River of Tears: The story of Rio Tinto-Zinc Mining: Earth Island.